Comments on: OSPF special areas: stubby, not so stubby, and totally stubby http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/ Study notes for the Cisco CCNP exam Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:36:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: teejay http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/comment-page-1/#comment-94463 teejay Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:36:52 +0000 http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/#comment-94463 Thanks sean,but would love it if it were illustrated diagramatically. Thanks sean,but would love it if it were illustrated diagramatically.

]]> By: xavi http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/comment-page-1/#comment-92239 xavi Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:15:45 +0000 http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/#comment-92239 NSSA - a difficult part in CCNP Route. Your article helped me a lot. Thank you very much good luck NSSA – a difficult part in CCNP Route. Your article helped me a lot. Thank you very much
good luck

]]> By: Nick Ion-nedez http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/comment-page-1/#comment-92168 Nick Ion-nedez Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:41:27 +0000 http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/#comment-92168 Thanks sean, now i am ready to sit for my ccnp certification! wow. Thanks sean, now i am ready to sit for my ccnp certification!

wow.

]]> By: Michael Wheeler http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/comment-page-1/#comment-92136 Michael Wheeler Sun, 26 Sep 2010 05:07:25 +0000 http://ccnprecertification.com/2007/05/19/ospf-special-areas-stubby-not-so-stubby-and-totally-stubby/#comment-92136 Thanks for your explanation. It cleared a few things up for me :> Thanks for your explanation. It cleared a few things up for me :>

]]>