<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EIGRP metrics and path selection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/</link>
	<description>Study notes for the Cisco CCNP exam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Astorino</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92970</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Astorino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 01:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92970</guid>
		<description>The reason is because the formula actually changes depending on if K5 is 0 or not 0.  If K5 = 0 that entire piece of the equation is not taken into consideration.  If K5 != 0 the K5/Reliability + K4 piece is added in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason is because the formula actually changes depending on if K5 is 0 or not 0.  If K5 = 0 that entire piece of the equation is not taken into consideration.  If K5 != 0 the K5/Reliability + K4 piece is added in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92179</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92179</guid>
		<description>I have same question as Chris said.it should be + in (K3*Delay)+(K5/(Reliability + K4))) not *.But everywhere the formula is written same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have same question as Chris said.it should be + in (K3*Delay)+(K5/(Reliability + K4))) not *.But everywhere the formula is written same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92173</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92173</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain to me why the classic EIGRP metric formula is correct when K5=0 will result in the mertic=0?
EIGRP Metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256-Load) + (K3*Delay)*(K5/(Reliability + K4)))

It would seem there should be a &#039;+&#039; between the K3 and K5 components in the formula like this ...
EIGRP Metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256-Load) + (K3*Delay)+(K5/(Reliability + K4)))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain to me why the classic EIGRP metric formula is correct when K5=0 will result in the mertic=0?<br />
EIGRP Metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256-Load) + (K3*Delay)*(K5/(Reliability + K4)))</p>
<p>It would seem there should be a &#8216;+&#8217; between the K3 and K5 components in the formula like this &#8230;<br />
EIGRP Metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256-Load) + (K3*Delay)+(K5/(Reliability + K4)))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esme</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92131</link>
		<dc:creator>esme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92131</guid>
		<description>hola te dejo dos formulas que ambas sirven para calcular la metrica de eigrp.

metric=(k1*BW+K3*DELAY)

2da. formula.... metric=(K1*BW+(K2*BW)/(256-LOAD)+(K3*DELAY)*(K5/(CONFILIDAD+K4))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hola te dejo dos formulas que ambas sirven para calcular la metrica de eigrp.</p>
<p>metric=(k1*BW+K3*DELAY)</p>
<p>2da. formula&#8230;. metric=(K1*BW+(K2*BW)/(256-LOAD)+(K3*DELAY)*(K5/(CONFILIDAD+K4))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehboob</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92043</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehboob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92043</guid>
		<description>EIGRP is used for Loadblancing upto 6paths</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EIGRP is used for Loadblancing upto 6paths</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehboob</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92042</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehboob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92042</guid>
		<description>Bandwidth and Delay is metric of EIGRP 
Its comfirmed 100%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bandwidth and Delay is metric of EIGRP<br />
Its comfirmed 100%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kishore</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92014</link>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92014</guid>
		<description>MTU doesnt affect path selection but I guess its just been included so that maybe in future they might put that in as a consideration as well.

just like ospf does check MTU when exchanging DD packets, maybe in future Eigrp might use this as well. Who knows;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MTU doesnt affect path selection but I guess its just been included so that maybe in future they might put that in as a consideration as well.</p>
<p>just like ospf does check MTU when exchanging DD packets, maybe in future Eigrp might use this as well. Who knows;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92011</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92011</guid>
		<description>You guys are right, it&#039;s tracked but not used in the calculation. 

Why the heck does every book I see, from a CCNA text up to Doyle, feel the need to include it when talking about metrics when it&#039;s really not used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are right, it&#8217;s tracked but not used in the calculation. </p>
<p>Why the heck does every book I see, from a CCNA text up to Doyle, feel the need to include it when talking about metrics when it&#8217;s really not used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92008</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92008</guid>
		<description>Although MTU and hop count are mentioned in &lt;b&gt;show ip eigrp topology&lt;/b&gt;, they aren&#039;t in the formula for calculating the metric, being &lt;i&gt;metric = [K1 * bandwidth + (K2 * bandwidth) / (256 - load) + K3 * delay] * [K5 / (reliability + K4)]&lt;/i&gt; so they really aren&#039;t metrics, since there is no way to include them in the metric calculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although MTU and hop count are mentioned in <b>show ip eigrp topology</b>, they aren&#8217;t in the formula for calculating the metric, being <i>metric = [K1 * bandwidth + (K2 * bandwidth) / (256 - load) + K3 * delay] * [K5 / (reliability + K4)]</i> so they really aren&#8217;t metrics, since there is no way to include them in the metric calculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-91913</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-91913</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Have a look at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094cb7.shtml

Minimum MTU along the path is an EIGRP metric, with the default K values it&#039;s not calculated though. It&#039;s there, look at the &lt;em&gt;show ip eigrp top&lt;/em&gt; output.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Have a look at <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094cb7.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094cb7.shtml</a></p>
<p>Minimum MTU along the path is an EIGRP metric, with the default K values it&#8217;s not calculated though. It&#8217;s there, look at the <em>show ip eigrp top</em> output.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

