<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EIGRP metrics and path selection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/</link>
	<description>Study notes for the Cisco CCNP exam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 02:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kishore</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92014</link>
		<dc:creator>Kishore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92014</guid>
		<description>MTU doesnt affect path selection but I guess its just been included so that maybe in future they might put that in as a consideration as well.

just like ospf does check MTU when exchanging DD packets, maybe in future Eigrp might use this as well. Who knows;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MTU doesnt affect path selection but I guess its just been included so that maybe in future they might put that in as a consideration as well.</p>
<p>just like ospf does check MTU when exchanging DD packets, maybe in future Eigrp might use this as well. Who knows;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92011</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92011</guid>
		<description>You guys are right, it&#039;s tracked but not used in the calculation. 

Why the heck does every book I see, from a CCNA text up to Doyle, feel the need to include it when talking about metrics when it&#039;s really not used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are right, it&#8217;s tracked but not used in the calculation. </p>
<p>Why the heck does every book I see, from a CCNA text up to Doyle, feel the need to include it when talking about metrics when it&#8217;s really not used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-92008</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-92008</guid>
		<description>Although MTU and hop count are mentioned in &lt;b&gt;show ip eigrp topology&lt;/b&gt;, they aren&#039;t in the formula for calculating the metric, being &lt;i&gt;metric = [K1 * bandwidth + (K2 * bandwidth) / (256 - load) + K3 * delay] * [K5 / (reliability + K4)]&lt;/i&gt; so they really aren&#039;t metrics, since there is no way to include them in the metric calculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although MTU and hop count are mentioned in <b>show ip eigrp topology</b>, they aren&#8217;t in the formula for calculating the metric, being <i>metric = [K1 * bandwidth + (K2 * bandwidth) / (256 - load) + K3 * delay] * [K5 / (reliability + K4)]</i> so they really aren&#8217;t metrics, since there is no way to include them in the metric calculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-91913</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-91913</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Have a look at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094cb7.shtml

Minimum MTU along the path is an EIGRP metric, with the default K values it&#039;s not calculated though. It&#039;s there, look at the &lt;em&gt;show ip eigrp top&lt;/em&gt; output.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Have a look at <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094cb7.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094cb7.shtml</a></p>
<p>Minimum MTU along the path is an EIGRP metric, with the default K values it&#8217;s not calculated though. It&#8217;s there, look at the <em>show ip eigrp top</em> output.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nt.factor</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/05/05/eigrp-metrics-and-path-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-91912</link>
		<dc:creator>nt.factor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=22#comment-91912</guid>
		<description>I believe that MTU is not a metric in EIGRP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that MTU is not a metric in EIGRP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
