Comments on: EIGRP

By: Craig

Craig — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:12:27 +0000

Thanks for the example on the selection of successor and feasible successor routes. It really helped me to understand the process.

By: Patrick K

Patrick K — Wed, 24 Jan 2007 05:30:50 +0000

I am a bit confused, about Via C, with an AD of 4+1 = 5

I understand the 4 bit which is the AD between the next-hop to the destination.

Why +1 instead of +2 which is the cost of between local router C and the next-hop router which is E?

maybe I got it wrong because I thought

FD= AD of next-hop router + cost between local router and the next-hop router

By: sean

sean — Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:42:44 +0000

Yes, you’re right. Good catch! I’ve updated the text.

Thanks!

Sean

By: Steven

Steven — Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:37:05 +0000

Please confirm if it is a typo??

In the topology table, C will have two possibilities to get to network D:
Via D, with an AD of 1
Via C, with an AD of 4+1 = 5
**** Should this be “Via E, “