<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise Composite Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/03/16/enterprise-composite-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/03/16/enterprise-composite-model/</link>
	<description>Study notes for the Cisco CCNP exam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolf_cut</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/03/16/enterprise-composite-model/comment-page-1/#comment-91903</link>
		<dc:creator>wolf_cut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=5#comment-91903</guid>
		<description>Performance:
We can configure each module independently and add up the hierarchical approach with the core access and distribution layers approach within each module. This gives independency of functions such as pushing the security outwards at the access layer then implementing intelligence at the distribution ex: QOS load balancingâ€¦
We now have explicit boundaries to actually define the interaction between modules and applications, note that we now have a building distribution and an edge distribution.

general note
From a global point of view it looks like core distribution and access yet in details in is small blocks of core distribution and access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Performance:<br />
We can configure each module independently and add up the hierarchical approach with the core access and distribution layers approach within each module. This gives independency of functions such as pushing the security outwards at the access layer then implementing intelligence at the distribution ex: QOS load balancingâ€¦<br />
We now have explicit boundaries to actually define the interaction between modules and applications, note that we now have a building distribution and an edge distribution.</p>
<p>general note<br />
From a global point of view it looks like core distribution and access yet in details in is small blocks of core distribution and access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadowman</title>
		<link>http://ccnprecertification.com/2004/03/16/enterprise-composite-model/comment-page-1/#comment-91900</link>
		<dc:creator>shadowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ertw.com/ccnp/?p=5#comment-91900</guid>
		<description>Hi,
The Campus Infrastructure module only contains the Building Access, the Building Distribution and the Building Core/Campus Backbone. The Network Management and the Server Farm submodules aren&#039;t part of it. However, they are part of Entreprise Campus Functional Area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
The Campus Infrastructure module only contains the Building Access, the Building Distribution and the Building Core/Campus Backbone. The Network Management and the Server Farm submodules aren&#8217;t part of it. However, they are part of Entreprise Campus Functional Area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

